NCVO comment on NAO report on government grants

Responding to the NAO report on government grants published today, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations noted that:

  • Grants to charities are a tiny proportion of the total grant funding the NAO report examines. The NAO report covers £292bn of government grants, of which £61bn goes to recipients outside the public sector. NCVO’s analysis shows UK charities received £2.56bn in government grant income in 2011/12.
  • There are clear advantages to grant funding – grants to voluntary organisations are a simple and efficient way for government to meet its objectives - avoiding the bureaucracy and costs of contracting
  • Grants from government are a rapidly declining part of the funding mix for charities – with contracts to deliver services now significantly more common than grants.

Andrew O'Brien, senior policy officer, said:

‘Grants are a critical part of the funding mix for voluntary organisations. Unfortunately, grants to charities are diminishing rapidly as a funding mechanism used by government – having more than halved in value within the last decade.

‘It's right that grant funding is scrutinised, and we welcome the NAO's call for better data collection on grants. But it is important to remember that grants to charities can be an efficient and effective way for government to meet its objectives and have the advantage of simplicity. If government wants to draw on the expertise of charities, it is important that they continue to use grants as one of their funding options.

‘Grants enable a public body to identify an organisation which can deliver the work it needs and let them get on with it. If they don't deliver, they don’t get the grant again. Freed from bureaucracy and prescriptive contract terms, charities can be more innovative in creating services that deliver the best results. Grants are particularly useful in funding very localised or niche services, where the costs of running a procurement exercise would be disproportionate.

‘A grant also avoids the pitfalls associated with more complicated contracting arrangements. We have seen how the payment mechanisms in the Work Programme, for example, have caused difficulty for contractors, government, and consequently for the people it is intended to help.’

Site by Clickingmad